Skip to main content


According to the historian Srinath Raghavan, “The ongoing stand-off between Indian and Chinese troops in Ladakh is a useful reminder of Faulkner's dictum that the “The past is never dead. It's not even past.” The current crisis practically sags under the weight of the gnarled history of the two countries' competing claims to this land without a people. And yet, bulk of the reportage and commentary on the unfolding situation is oblivious of the long shadow of the past - except to toss up such factoids as the Galwan Valley having been a "flashpoint" ahead of the war of 1962. There is no way of grasping what is at stake and interpreting the behaviour of all concerned without coming seriously to grips with the history of boundary dispute.”

Ten years ago, we published Srinath Raghavan’s War and Peace in Modern India. The book is a study of Jawaharlal Nehru's handling of a concatenation of international crises during his long years as prime minister of India. China and the boundary dispute loom large in this book - as they do in any retrospective on the Nehru years. The book offers a detailed account of India's policies towards the contested boundary with China, starting from the initial months after Independence through to the debacle of winter 1962. If you want a careful analysis of how and why the dispute in Ladakh is different from that in Arunachal Pradesh, or what the Chinese claims lines of 1956, 1960 and 1962 actually amounted to, you only need to reach for War and Peace in Modern India.


Raghavan's next book, which we published in 2013, is 1971: A Global History of the Creation of Bangladesh. India's relationship with China figures prominently in this book too. Indeed, the book's surprising account of China's role during this pivotal crisis is important not just to understand the long arc of the India-China relationship, but also to place it in a triangular geopolitical context involving the United States as well. In this instance, what's past may well be prologue.


Srinath Raghavan’s career path has been unusual. He is possibly the only Indian scholar of the first grade who has also been a second lieutenant. Born in 1977, he joined the Indian army after being at schools in Hyderabad, Kolkata, and Chennai. His bachelor’s degree was in physics from the University of Madras (1997). An infantry officer in the Rajputana Rifles, he decamped (metaphorically) in 2003 to do an MA, and then a PhD (2007) at the Department of War Studies, King’s College London. War and Peace in Modern India came out of the dissertation he wrote there. After being Lecturer in Defence Studies at King’s College London for three years he returned to India and was Senior Fellow at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi. He is now Professor of History and International Relations at Ashoka University and Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the King’s India Institute of King’s College London.


Popular posts from this blog


BUY THE PAPERBACK       FROM THE REVIEWS   Review in SOCIAL HISTORY, USA by Benjamin Siegel The Great Agrarian Conquest represents a massive intervention into the contemporary historiography of South Asia, elaborating upon some conventional wisdom but upending a great deal more of it. Readers might well place this book in conversation with works like Ranajit Guha ’ s A Rule of Property for Bengal (1963) and Bernard Cohn ’ s Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge (1997), to which The Great Agrarian Conquest owes some preliminary inspiration. Yet what Bhattacharya o ff ers is a wholly original account of the transformation to agrarian colonialism . . .   Few volumes in South Asian history have been more awaited than this monograph, Neeladri Bhattacharya ’ s fi rst. One of the most celebrated mentors and researchers at New Delhi ’ s Jawaharlal Nehru University, Bhattacharya retired in 2017 after a decades-long career. His formal scholarly output, limited to sev

Dhriti K. Lahiri Choudhury

We are very sad to know that Professor Dhriti K. Lahiri Choudhury has passed away. He died on Friday morning in Calcutta.  Dr Lahiri Choudhury, born in 1931, did many things: with a PhD from Leeds in English Literature, he combined his work with elephants with teaching at Rabindra Bharati University. He was a member of the IUCN elephant group and of Project Elephant. It was a joy for us to publish his Trunk Full of Tales: Seventy Years with the Indian Elephant -- the editorial sessions involved long, old-style sessions of story-telling which should have been around a campfire. He would tell of his many hair-raising journeys across Assam, Meghalaya, Bengal, the Barak Valley and elsewhere, in search of rogue elephants or on arduous elephant surveys, when the evenings always began with emptying blood-soaked boots of leeches; he would talk lovingly of the elephants in his childhood home in Mymensingh -- now in Bangladesh -- their names and foibles; and of drinking elephant milk

"Every nationality has its own distinct stench": by G. Kanato Chophy

A wonderfully written and deeply moving new book on society and history in Nagaland over the past couple of centuries has just been published by Permanent Black and Ashoka University in collaboration with the New India Foundation. Its young author, G. Kanato Chophy, is one of the brightest Naga scholars on the Indian horizon from the north-east. Permanent Black asked Kanato to reflect on what’s in his book and why he wrote it. For some time now I’ve been wanting to work on a book called “constitutional Indians” – a concept that I have briefly touched upon in the conclusion of the book you’ve just published. My argument in it is that, for a putatively renegade ethnic community like the Nagas, the “idea of India” hangs precariously in the balance, supported by a piece of paper, the Indian Constitution, which we have until recently understood as a guarantee of equal rights to Indian citizens irrespective of religion, ethnicity, class, and gender. I belong to an emerging class of educated